When there’s an issue of repeated gearbox failure, the obvious route to resolving it is via the gearbox. But the obvious answer is not always the correct answer – or the simplest, or the most cost-effective. That’s why there’s a big difference between knowledge alone and know-how, as Mahesh Patel, Engineering Manager at ERIKS, explains.
A major pet food
manufacturer operates
four product extrusion
lines, each incorporating
a gearbox sourced from an
American manufacturer. Initially
designed to run with a nominal
input speed of 1,400rpm, for
operational reasons, the customer
has increased this to 2,000rpm.
Unfortunately, the result has been
repeated gearbox failures.
ERIKS’ Norwich Service Centre
was called in to make running
repairs as often as every three to six
months. These repairs were made
even more challenging due to the
difficulty of obtaining spare parts
for a gearbox made in America.
The customer felt it was time to
upgrade to gearboxes with a faster
running speed. But that wasn’t as
simple as it sounds.
The customer’s co-axial
extrusion line gearboxes have
the input and output shafts
directly in line. With gearboxes of
identical design, size and footprint
being impossible to source, a
gearbox upgrade would mean
reordering all four extrusion lines to
accommodate them – with all the
additional design and engineering
costs involved.
In addition, between failures, the
existing gearboxes are doing the job
they are designed for. So if the root
cause of failure can be addressed
and rectified, then there’s no reason
to go to the expense of replacing
them.
ERIKS’ engineers assessed the
situation and discovered that the
higher running speed is causing
the oil in the gearboxes to overheat.
The overheated oil then breaks
down, so it no longer effectively
lubricates and protects the gears
and bearings.
For example, the gear case outer
temperature was measured to be 100°C; therefore, the oil temperature
would be assumed to be up to
110°C – unsustainable without
breaking down and failing as a
lubricant.
However, the oil being used
was the correct specification and
viscosity for the application. So
it’s not an option to change to a
different oil to cope with the higher
running speed and temperatures.
PLAYING IT COOL
If the gearbox is the right gearbox
for the application, the oil is the
oil right for the gearbox, and
the high operating temperature
can’t be avoided at the required
running speed, the problem isn’t
the gearbox. It is how the oil
behaves when the high operating
temperature of the gearbox heats
the oil.
This means the solution is not to
change the gearbox but to resolve
the overheating of the oil.
ERIKS’ answer has been to
design and engineer a cooling
system to remove the oil from
the gearbox, cool it to a suitable
temperature, and return the newly
cooled oil to the gearbox.
The design involves the lubricant
being drawn out of the box through
a pipe, carrying the oil through a
vessel full of
chilled water.
This chilled water
is already part of
the production
process on the
extruder side,
so providing it
requires no more engineering or
energy than simply piping it into the
vessel.
Passing the oil through the
vessel rapidly reduces the lubricant
temperature to just 60°C; in just a fourminute cycle, the 40 litres of lubricant
is cooled, at which point it can be returned to the gearbox once more.
Not only has ERIKS designed
and manufactured the solution.
They have also made all the
necessary food-contact parts out
of food-grade stainless steel, so
there are no
food safety
complications
arising from the
new system.
Now installed
on one of the
extrusion lines,
the oil cooling system has proved
so effective at preventing gearbox
failures that the customer has
commissioned the same system
for their remaining three identical
gearboxes.
www.eriks.co.uk